| re: Call for submission on |
| [22374] by "Anonymous" (cache-mtc-aa04.proxy.aol.com)
on Tue 03 Jun 2003 23:51:28
[ reply ] [ up ]
|
New York Code Orange Jaisini new art series
The creativity of Jaisini is not designed to be preaching or too critical. Paul Jaisini reached his level of mastership to know exactly that life is worth living to look in the future having no regrets about the past.
In the aftermath of sept 11 there was a motto for New Yorkers to go on living and conducting business as usual in order to fight the very concept of terrorism, fear. And being cosmopolitan as Londoners or people of world greatest cities New Yorkers prove to be hard to scare.
The spirit of a great city is reflected in the cutting edge works of Jaisini. There is a given subject and a special atmosphere but to Jaisini it would not fulfil his artistic ambition to simply record the rubble and destruction.
Every picture dedicated to NYC in code orange is a mini scenario for a performance with different characters, roles, subtexts and screenplays. Every character in Jaisini's visual rendition of NYC in code orange is usually a typical New Yorker conducting daily life and encountering an unusual situation as viewed by the art director who came up with his own vision of what life could be like in a city that is no longer troubled.
To create such visual scenarios technically, Jaisini had to work with photos as he would with oil paintings or watercolors i.e. manually and without any automatic options, as this would reduce the degree of realism he aimed to achieve through the control of light and pictorial depth.
Perhaps what has been created in the New York series is a glimpse of what New York streets could look like in a futuristic utopia with perpetually developing scenarios of human life.
Jaisini shows that unlimited potential exists in a snap shot of contemporary life. That is why Jaisini's art works are highly demanded and anticipated.
Yustas Kotz Gottlieb Text Copyright New York 2003
All rights reserved
http://jaisini.artbabyart.net/
Art of Paul Jaisini by Yustas Kotz-Gottlieb
http://jaisini.artbabyart.net/about.html
Who is Artist Paul Jaisini
|
|
|
|
| re: Call for submission on |
| [23109] by "Red" (cache-ra06.proxy.aol.com)
on Tue 01 Jul 2003 20:47:59
[ reply ] [ up ]
|
The art-speak does distance me a little from the experience. As a poet, I am not used to this off-screen observer view of matters as if the camera and commentary hovered in the background, cerebrated and relatively uninvolved. I suppose that is how art crit. is done, but I hunger more - like what Elizabeth Bown or Margaret Mead did for writing in
anthropology. A way to engage without sacrificing the science. That’s just my
idiosyncrasy. What do you personally like/not about Jaisini’s erotics. Do they get you hot? Or does it stay pretty cerebral, as portrayal rather than imaginative engagement? |
|
|
|
| re: Call for submission on |
| [23225] by "Joyce" (cache-da06.proxy.aol.com)
on Fri 04 Jul 2003 00:21:56
[ reply ] [ up ]
|
This reads like a thesis paper, is it? I cannot comment on this essay because I have not seen the picture -- however, I do find some of your conclusions interesting. As a thesis paper, I think you are probably okay...
Joyce Freeman-Clark |
|
|
|
| re: Call for submission on |
| [23235] by "thom yorke" (cache-da06.proxy.aol.com)
on Fri 04 Jul 2003 13:39:30
[ reply ] [ up ]
|
would help if any of us knew who jainsini was
this from the official website:
in the words of dogbomb; how... "contemporary"
example:
http://jaisini.artbabyart.net/image/optiyustas.jpgo
oh look he does sculpture shite too:
http://jaisini.artbabyart.net/image/optifinger.jpg
and on another note this story must be old because as far as i was aware, the US dropped its terrorism threat level below orange some time ago
Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, such as
when you find a trout in the milk. Henry David Thoreau
|
|
|
|
| re: Call for submission on |
| [23589] by "Mathew" (cache-ra06.proxy.aol.com)
on Thu 17 Jul 2003 01:09:40
[ reply ] [ up ]
|
The articles themselves are well done, the ideas expressed in a clear manner.
As for my response, I try to be a man of my word.
And about the write-ups, I need to say this: As an artist and a writer, both of which I have done professionally (although now I devote most of my time to writing) it is VERY hard for me to "get meaning" or "derive an absolute truth" from art (or even writing for that matter). Once something gets 'artsy' I tend to lose interest. A body of work, or a piece of art should do something different for each different person who views it. I am totally into comic books. I love the art. Yes, it has one purpose - to tell the story. And yet, there are many ways to do it! There are people who like an artist for how they go about their story-telling art, and others who don't like it for the same reason.
Nevertheless, in spite of my opinionated ranting, you are good at what you are doing with your writing. |
|
|
|