| re: Econo Question |
| [18721] by "nonstop max 24hr/day" (208-58-249-153.s153.tnt1.nwhv.ct.dialup.rcn.com)
on Sat 04 Jan 2003 22:33:18
[ reply ] [ up ]
|
|
well its not a one-2-threego punch AGAINST the econom what mor can u ask for |
|
|
|
| re: Econo Question |
| [18724] by "Econo Student" (pool-141-156-176-101.esr.east.verizon.net)
on Sat 04 Jan 2003 22:39:53
[ reply ] [ up ]
|
|
And speaking of economics, I just looked at Forbes 15 richest people and none of those guys were economists. Why the heck should I listen to economists? Taking a lesson from Bill Gates and Sam Walton's family, I think I'll drop out of school and start a company^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hfamily with one of the Walton grandkids. |
|
|
|
| re: Econo Question |
| [18727] by "TOBOT the ASK" (h-66-167-161-211.phlapafg.covad.net)
on Sat 04 Jan 2003 23:58:56
[ reply ] [ up ]
|
|
i punch u the aconomy omages, that is what |
|
|
|
| re: Econo Question |
| [18739] by "reversibletypetoastr" (wwwcache.lanl.gov)
on Mon 06 Jan 2003 00:51:49
[ reply ] [ up ]
|
we need to ask ourselves: is this era d post-Keynesian, neo-Marxian? Or are we still in another centure of post-Marx neo-Keynes?
these thihngs make a big diff. |
|
|
|
