snoot.org message board: re: JJ (zoom)

[ back | refresh | last 25 | post new ]

re: why
[43094] by "Curtis" (pcp04464961pcs.trnrsv01.nj.comcast.net)   on Sun 17 Oct 2004 03:59:57     reply ] [ up ]
"I have seen many games ruined by 'experts' who do so in retaliation"

What games have you seen ruined by experts?  How?  Just curious.
re: why
[43100] by "deni" (netcache-3003.bay.webtv.net)   on Sun 17 Oct 2004 09:35:19     reply ] [ up ]
I have stopped negative remarks on the scribble boards, and that is why you remember it from "awhile back" -- it still holds.  

I will not let accustations in this forum go unchallenged, be they from beginner, troll, or expert.  Such as, "where every move is strategic and well-planned out--that they even tell you what word and where to play it. How fun!" No, those are suggestions.  If you see a better play, or choose not to make that play, play another.  And, it IS fun; see, in the spirit of the game, we find cooperation and strategy fun.

"You make beginners feel unwelcome." I am the only person that I have notice that says, "Welcome to scribble" when I notice a newbie.  The newbie that started this thread suggested that we give advice instead of name-calling.  I do give friendly tips; if they are construed as anything else, how exactly would you like me to word them?

If you are offended by anything I have recently typed, is it because you developed a dislike for me from the start and can no longer read anything I write objectively?
re: JJ
[43102] by "deni" (netcache-3003.bay.webtv.net)   on Sun 17 Oct 2004 11:12:12     reply ] [ up ]
The thread you are referring to is this one:
Disturbing chat comment
[40443] by "alpha"(netcache-3001-1.bay.webtv.net)   on Sun 01 Aug 2004 17:09:43.    
and it can be found a couple of pages back in this discussion board, for anyone to read.

You will note, no one told me to back off; alpha didn't even mention my name.  I came forward and I took responsibility for my actions, admitted my wrong doing and made amends.

If you don't see this as responsible, then you have, as I previously stated, lost objectivity in reading my posts.