snoot.org message board: re: solitare games (zoom)

[ back | refresh | last 25 | post new ]

re: solitare games
[43905] by "anonymous" (12.145.108.11)   on Thu 04 Nov 2004 12:43:37     reply ] [ up ]
And I think you're just itching to fight with anyone that doesn't agree with your point of view, as evidenced by your remark "I don't think there is a need for such a smug attitude" (and some of your responses in the thread about advanced games, too) -- I didn't read any kind of a smug attitude in Curtis' email, but you did.

No one is trying to argue with you; they're just stating their point of view.

Now, go ahead and have at me: I won't respond, because, like I said, no one wants to argue with you!
re: solitare games
[43919] by "Curtis" (pandora.isinet.com)   on Thu 04 Nov 2004 14:44:07     reply ] [ up ]
You read that totally wrong.  I wasn't being smug - I was making a point.

The point of solitaire games would be so that players wouldn't "lock up" games that aren't supposed to be.  With that said I'm not saying that we should have these games but I can see their purpose.