Last Cereal: Message Board: re: Non-rhetorical semi-circular fudge (zoom)

[ back | refresh | last 25 | post new ]

re: Non-rhetorical semi-circular fudge
[7789] by "Veavitdpoh" (136.204.212.78.)   on Wed 12 Dec 2001 23:59:12     reply ] [ up ]
See, my rambling works better vocalized. I very quickly lose track of what I've said and whether or not it may have relevance to the immediate flow of dialogue. :P

Yes, formalized language is imperfect communication, especially when trying to define something as indefinite as love (fun to play with, though). Still, it's all we've got. While Jackson Pollock u.gif paintings may actually be suited better to communicate what's in our hearts, at least we're both on the same chapter with language - if not the same page.

Is it fair to say that we should abandon the attempt? Maybe the philosophers were too hep on categorizing the universe into sets of characters, too damn intellectual even when discussing the height of instinct. Meh. I like breaking things down, personally. It helps seperate concepts such as that fine cuban cigar from the scent of a rainstorm, from the light touch of another's hair on your chest. That's just me, though - it may not work for you. It may not work for anyone. Like I know what the fuck I'm talking about.

I am Jack's seventh-level elven ranger.